Table of Content
Concerning the alleged acquisitions of funeral homes in Logansport, Minden and Coushatta, the court agrees with defendants that plaintiff has no standing to challenge any alleged acquisitions in those locations. Plaintiff simply did not attempt to enter business in those locations. See Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 365 F.2d 629, 633 (5th Cir. 1966). Plaintiff evidently contends that Logansport, Minden and Coushatta are within the relevant geographical area at issue in this case.
As defendants have observed, the four-year period of limitations for damages under § 7 of the Clayton Act begins to run from the date of the alleged acquisition. Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.,491 F. Supp. Thus, this court finds that plaintiff's claim under § 7 of the Clayton Act is barred by the statute of limitations insofar as it concerns the alleged acquisition by Rose-Neath of the First National Funeral Home of Shreveport. On January 30, 1981, defendants jointly moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set out hereinafter, the court agrees with defendants that plaintiff's allegations are insufficient as a matter of law.
Obituaries of Rhodes Funeral Home
Search results are sorted by a combination of factors to give you a set of choices in response to your search criteria. “Preferred” listings, or those with featured website buttons, indicate YP advertisers who directly provide information about their businesses to help consumers make more informed buying decisions. YP advertisers receive higher placement in the default ordering of search results and may appear in sponsored listings on the top, side, or bottom of the search results page.
We bring together decades of experience caring for families of all cultural backgrounds and diverse walks of life. We pledge to treat you and your loved ones just like family, and we guarantee to offer services that meet all of your specifications while exceeding all of your expectations. A Insofar as the designated and authorized funeral home in connection with its affiliated insurance companies, I say they do. The court agrees with defendants' argument that plaintiff's claim regarding the alleged acquisition in 1973 has expired by operation of the statute of limitations. 15 U.S.C. § 15b establishes a four-year limitation period on an antitrust claim brought under § 7 of the Clayton Act. As mentioned previously, this action was not filed until May 17, 1978, more than four years after any acquisition which could have taken place in 1973.
Add a Memory
In addition, there is no vertical price fixing since no "resale price" is involved. Accordingly, the court finds that plaintiff's allegations of price fixing are meritless. All of the defendant insurance companies agreed with one or more funeral homes to serve as "authorized" funeral director for their policies. Rose-Neath was the authorized funeral director for Kilpatrick, Wellman and Boone Funeral Home, Inc. for Security, and Osborn's Funeral Home, Inc. (Osborn's) for Fireside.
It is considered to be among the most beautiful funeral homes in the United States. Obits.nola.com needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding. Leave a memory or share a photo or video below to show your support. That anyone who files an antitrust complaint setting forth a valid cause of action be entitled to a full-dress trial notwithstanding the absence of any significant probative evidence tending to support the complaint. Thus recorded the founding of what was to become Jacob Schoen & Son, Inc., a family of Funeral Directors that has served the New Orleans area families for six generations, and whose facilities have grown to serve the families of New Orleans, Jefferson, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes. Peters Street funeral parlor, situated between Montegut and Clouet, and in 1879, the firm moved to 527 Elysian Fields.
Past Services
Within the context of this action, this allegation is inexplicable. An insurance company that issues funeral service policies assures that it will be able to furnish those services by contracting with a funeral home. To say that any of the defendant insurance companies sells only in an area where a provider funeral home is located puts the cart before the horse. Presumably, if no funeral homes were located in this area to serve as providers, it would be most difficult for an insurance company to assure that holders of burial service insurance policies would be able to receive those services; therefore, it is likely that few funeral service policies would be issued.
With over 1,900 locations, Dignity Memorial providers proudly serve over 400,000 families a year. With over 1,900 locations, Dignity Memorial providers proudly serve over 375,000 families a year. This factual situation contrasts sharply with the instant case, where three separate insurance companies have contractual relationships with four separate funeral homes.
Jacob Schoen & Son Funeral Home
In the pretrial order, plaintiff added one further contention which was not clearly discernible from his deposition. Plaintiff argues that the fact that defendant insurance companies sell funeral service policies only in areas where authorized funeral directors are located constitutes a territorial allocation, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act. Jacob Schoen & Son Funeral Home is one of the experienced funeral homes and cremations providers in Louisiana. Jacob Schoen & Son Funeral Home is proud to offer funeral services, burial services, and cremation services. Since 1859, the Jacob Schoen & Son Funeral Home has cared for Central LA families with compassion and commitment to excellence. In addition to the services we offer, you will receive an online memorial that you can share with family and friends.
Needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding. Neither in his brief in opposition to the motion for summary judgment nor in his pretrial memorandum of law has plaintiff quarreled with any of the factual information this court has relied upon in preparing this Ruling. A Any written agreement or oral agreement, but that there was a tacit agreement and that they operated in parallel action consensually. Q Now, let me go back and direct your attention to the funeral homes that are named as defendants in your complaint. A No, other than the tacit the arrangement which is parallel with the funeral home as far as with the insurance companies. In 1935, the Schoen family acquired the beautifully landscaped and architecturally stunning Canal Street mansion, a New Orleans landmark, and converted it to a funeral home but without any of the typical preparation areas to keep the building intact.
Plaintiffs alleged that 192 of a total of 224 funeral homes in the State of Alabama had contractual relationships with Brown-Service. Thus, plaintiff's inability to prove that defendants conspired or agreed to restrain trade, whether through operation of the McCarran-Ferguson Act or because of the insufficiency of his allegation of conscious parallelism, renders his claims under § 1 of the Sherman Act insufficient as a matter of law. Similarly, in this case, plaintiff has never alleged that defendants actually conspired to restrain trade.
As the pretrial order clearly discloses, there are many questions of fact which have not been resolved. However, none of those issues of fact are material to a resolution of the legal issues addressed in this Ruling. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. After an informal status conference, the court ordered plaintiff to submit a second amended complaint, in complete conformance with the court's April 11 ruling. Plaintiff filed this document on May 27, 1980, but it also did not comply with the court's ruling. In the interest of proceeding with this rapidly aging case, the defendants apparently avoided filing further objections to the second amended complaint, choosing instead to depose plaintiff to discover the nature of his allegations.
The insurance company defendants are Kilpatrick Life Insurance Company , Security Industrial Insurance Company and Fireside Commercial Life Insurance Company . Finally, named as individual defendants are Virginia K. Shehee , Charles S. Boone (C. S. Boone) and E. J. Ourso , each of whom has been named only in his or her capacity as an executive officer with a funeral home and/or an insurer. Information indicate affirmatively that plaintiff's claims, for the most part, are barred by the McCarran-Ferguson Act since they are based upon provisions contained in insurance policies. To begin with, the Fifth Circuit's reversal of the district court was based upon the principles of review concerning the granting of a Rule 12 motion.
Each defendant insurance company issues "funeral service insurance". The primary benefit of this insurance is a funeral service, and each policy states a face value for this service. In addition, an "official" or "authorized" funeral director is designated in each policy to provide the funeral service. Each policy provides that if an insured's family chooses not to avail themselves of the services of the authorized funeral director, the family receives an alternative cash payment of at least 75 per cent of the policy's face value.
All other marks contained herein are the property of their respective owners.
The overwhelming market power of Liberty National and Brown-Service is not alleged and does not exist. More importantly, Liberty National and its subsidiary allegedly operated as a contractually-tied juggernaut in crushing competition, while in this case plaintiff does not allege that the independent insurance companies have contracted or operate as one. We try to offer you a home—a comforting and inviting place to gather in remembrance and celebration of lives lived well. As a funeral home in New Orleans, our experienced staff is committed to this vision and passionate about making your time with us as memorable and uplifting as possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment